picture of sin

Sina’s PKM

think by analogy

We can really only think by analogy.

This was the thesis of the Hofstaders book Surfaces and Essences.

I've only read a bit of the book but also some summaries.

It's analogy all the way down. In essence, a word can have an infinite number of meanings.

We can also be in an infinite number of situations. We can only draw on limited resources.

We must then reason by analogy.

We put to much power on words. Praise be the almighty Wittgenstein came and saved us.

This stands somewhat in opposition to Semantic knowledge tree and first principles thinking

Pages that link here:

think in graphs
As an incident response engineer at Google, nearly every incident I’ve investigated leads to one common truth: relationships between events are more important than the events themselves

index
✨ First time here? Read the welcome message

first principles thinking
A form of thinking and reasoning that starts with an axiomatic set of given constrains and moves forward in logical steps

Current progress:

Loading... articles read πŸ€“

clear progress? 🚨