picture of sin

Sina’s PKM

cinema is centerless and originless

[ Film analysis ][ Atomic Note ]

From Towards a positive Definition of World Cinema, this is the idea that cinema has existed forever, and is in essence centerless and without a true starting point. This frees filmmakers to try and see what works, instead of following "rules", since those would juse be some guidelines for some time in some period of history.

This quote sums it up nicely

What is cinema? Is it not story? Nagib say she agrees with the german filmmaker Alexender Kluge who said

‘cinema has existed for over ten thousand years in the minds of human beings’ in the form of ‘associative currents, daydreams, sensual experiences and streams of consciousness. The technical discovery only made it reproducible’ (1975: 208) (30)

Pages that link here:

Towards a positive Definition of World Cinema
[ Film analysis ] In this essay, which is actually a chapter of the book Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture and Politics in Film, Lúcia Nagib puts forward the idea that 1) using the term “world cinema” as the Other from Hollywood is reductive and wrong, and 2) tries to reclaim the term “world cinema” to actually mean the world

Atomic Note
An atomic note should contain only one single idea

Current progress:

Loading... articles read 🤓

clear progress? 🚨